The silent killer – smog in Poland


The winter is approaching Poland, and together with gradually descending temperatures comes the recurring problem – smog. WHO Report (2016) clearly proved Polish infirmity – out of 50 most polluted cities in the European Union, 33 are located in Poland. Last winter, Poland has been announced “the China of Europe” in terms of pollution, when one day Warsaw had the most toxic air in the entire world. Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) standards were exceeded by more than 3000% (Wantuch, 2017). According to the European Environment Agency Report (2016), Poland’s poor air quality causes 48,000 premature deaths every year and shortens each person’s life by 9 months. Silesian cities inhabitants inhale the amount of toxins comparable to smoking 7 cigarettes a day - the smog is silently killing Polish population.

The problem of smog in Poland has been arising for many years and successive governments have marginalised it. The main reason for this lies in Polish economy dependency on coal (Szypulski, 2017). Low-stack emission (defined as the emission of harmful dust and gases from transport, households, and industry at the height of no more than 40 m) is the culprit of smog in this region (Kaczmarczyk, 2015). The Polish roads become more congested and the industry lacks proper coal regulations. However, the real source of the problem appears in the heating season when households start to burn coal, trash, and other cheap materials in old-generation stoves, which are inefficient and emit large amounts of pollutants into the atmosphere.

Smog is an example of negative externality in Poland due to an excessive and unwise use of natural resources and due to failing in putting the correct price on the use of these resources. Smog exists as a result of the market failure, which is caused by lack of property rights - nobody owns a clean air but everyone can use it because it is a public good (non-excludable and non-rivalrous). However, when air gets very polluted, it becomes a common-pool resource (still non-excludable but rival). In this situation behavior of Polish citizens can be described using the economic term Tragedy of Commons. People acting in their own best interest collectively result in smog and exhaust the level of clean air available to others.

There are different sources of pollutants in Poland, therefore various economic methods should be used in order to solve the problem of smog. 

Transport
31% of cars on Polish roads are more than 20 years old and fail to meet basic Euro emissions standards (GIOŚ, 2017). Command and control regulation (CAC), namely the appropriate legislation clearly stating what level of emission is admissible would help to combat smog. The car owners would be obliged to have a regular service of their vehicle and would receive a sticker certifying the met ecological standards. Pigovian Tax for the entrance to the CBD could also help to reduce pollution and traffic. The higher tax for cars with poor exhaust technology would be an economic incentive for them to improve. Double dividend (a positive side effect) would improve the environment and offset distortionary taxes.

Industry
80% of Polish electricity comes from coal-burning (Kaliski et al. 2012). Industries often lack proper regulation on the quality standards of coal, which could be solved by proper legislation (CAC). Cap-and-trade solution would be pivotal to manage the problem of excessive emission. In this case, a fixed amount of pollution would be set and firms would trade their pollution permits on the market. In this manner, a value would be created on the good, which previously had no price. Permits would need to be well-defined and scarce and could be auctioned off or allocated to the firms for free (grandfathering).

Households
There is lack of regulation on the quality of coal sold to individuals and lack of education, which leads to extensive burning of coal and trash to heat houses. Command and control regulation including replacement of old stoves and thermomodernization (insulation of buildings) is the best possible solution. The proper legislation should be followed by well-functioning control activities and severe fines for non-compliance with environmental standards. Coal sold to individuals should be also appropriately taxed to enhance searching for more sustainable solutions and improving defective, inefficient stoves.

The most significant benefit of taking above-mentioned actions is the protection of our and future generation from toxic air. Elimination of smog will significantly contribute to the improvement of health. Command and control regulation of transport seems to be feasible (e.g.in Berlin) and would significantly reduce air pollution in the crowded CBD. Society, however, tends to be unfavourable in case of taxes. They would also make firms and services in the centre lose clients. The most important way of combating smog in Poland would require the industry to become less dependent on coal. The tradable pollution permits system is said to be the most cost-effective way of environmental protection (Hanley et al. 2013) and would allow efficiently controlling the level of coal emissions, however, there is a problem of initial allocation mechanism of permits.
The problem of smog in Poland accumulates during winter because of trash and coal burning in households. This problem is particularly difficult to be solved because of lack of appropriate control instruments. Moreover, some households cannot afford improvement of technology. Coal tax could be an incentive to switch to renewables but undesirably could enhance people to burn trash and cheaper material.

Currently, the Polish government is working on creating proper legislation. Moreover, it is financing replacement of old technology in poor, rural areas. Authorities of Cracow are considering imposing an environmental tax on the car access to the city centre. A few times due to smog public transport in Warsaw and Cracow was free of charge. Currently, Poland is far behind other European countries in terms of air quality, therefore the situation needs to be solved and proper actions have to be taken in order to protect the whole European population from toxic, spreading air.

About the author:

Iga Józefiak is an undergraduate student of Geography and Sustainable Development at the University of St Andrews. She is particularly concerned about the issues of climate change, especially due to the fact that her home country, Poland, highly depends on coal in energy sector. 

Links to the original story:





Reference list:


European Environmental Agency (2016). Air Quality in Europe – 2016 Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 [online at: https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0ahUKEwjT6sCBr6_XAhXOIlAKHVbDDR0QFghIMAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eea.europa.eu%2Fpublications%2Fair-quality-in-europe-2016%2Fdownload&usg=AOvVaw0W9LCkGQ04ONSNk9_7cKzA] [accessed: 04.11.2017]
Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (2017). Stan Środowiska w Polsce – sygnały 2016. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska. Warsaw.

Hanley N, Shogren J and White B (2013) Introduction to Environmental Economics, 2nd edition. Oxford Univeristy Press

Kaczmarczyk, M. (2015). Niska emisja – od przyczyn występowania do sposobów eliminacji. Kraków: Geosystem Burek, Kotyza s.c. p.144

Kaliski, M. Nagy, S. Siemek, J. Sikora, A. Szurlej, A. (2012). Natural Gas in Poland and the European Union. [online at: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BSL2-0026-0128] [accessed on: 05.11.2017]

Szypulski, P. (2017). Smog – is it better or worse? The history of smog in Poland. [online at: http://www.ekologia.pl/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska/problem-smogu-w-polsce-to-nie-jest-nowa-rzecz-wywiad-z-pawlem-szypulskim-z-greenpeace-polska,22446.html] [accessed on: 03.11.2017]

Wantuch, D. (2017). Polacy duszą się smogiem. To już nie są żarty! Normy przekroczone nawet o 3 tys. proc. Gazeta Wyborcza. [online at: http://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,21221597,polacy-dusza-sie-smogiem-to-juz-nie-sa-zarty-normy-przekroczone.html] [accessed on: 05.11.2017]

World Health Organization (2016). Most polluted cities and town in the EU. [online at: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyIT4l4WIAEpzuF.jpg:large] [accessed: 04.11.2017]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can electrical vehicles clean up Europe's transportation sector?

Economic incentives to reduce plastic packaging in supermarkets